Risks And Challenges Facing Bitcoin Cash (BCH)

No blockchain project's future is guaranteed. As a Bitcoin fork, Bitcoin Cash inherited great opportunities but also shouldered its own risks.

Let's identify and understand the challenges that could impact BCH's price performance and long-term success in the years ahead.

Scaling Priorities over Store of Value

Unlike Bitcoin, which focuses on sound money properties, Bitcoin Cash prioritizes on-chain scaling to enable higher transaction throughput now.

It presents an upside if peer-to-peer payments increase usage but also risks over-reliance on a volatile speculative asset that may not stabilize in value as quickly as BTC. Higher velocities could increase volatility.

Competition from Alternative Coins

The cryptocurrency ecosystem has expanded dramatically since Bitcoin Cash launched in 2017. Where it once aimed to provide higher transaction capacity than Bitcoin alone, hundreds of blockchain projects are now tackling similar goals through various technical approaches.

Ethereum has solidified its position as the leading smart contracts platform, with a massive head start in developer mindshare and an enormous network of DApps and decentralized services built on top.

Other programmable blockchains like Cardano and Polkadot have also gained traction with innovative technical roadmaps focusing on scalability, interoperability, and sustainability. These networks could siphon apps and projects built on Bitcoin Cash in past years.

For payments and transfers, high-speed layer-1 networks like Solana, Avalanche, and Terra continue expanding their ecosystems and user bases at an explosive pace.

Privacy coins like Monero have also carved a sizable niche for those seeking anonymized transactions. Stablecoins also satisfy payment and remittance needs while avoiding volatility.

Major exchanges now list hundreds of projects, giving consumers more excellent choices. New blockchain databases and decentralized storage solutions daily emerge as alternatives to traditional frameworks.

Potential Centralization Pressures

While aiming to remain decentralized, Bitcoin Cash development and mining rely on fewer key companies and individuals than Bitcoin. Over-optimization for particular interests could concentrate on influence risks if governance falters or splits reoccur. Maintaining diversity remains important in the long term.

Regulatory Uncertainty Hampers Adoption

Unclear securities rules and evolving AML/KYC frameworks vary remarkably by country for cryptocurrencies as an emerging tech.

Restrictions in economies like China hamper usage growth potential until transparent compliance structures are standardized. This regulatory ambiguity increases the long-term risk for any cryptocurrency to achieve broad adoption as a payments network.

Find insights in this article: Bitcoin's Legal Status Around the World

Exchange Rate Volatility Hinders Spending

Until cryptocurrency stabilizes in value more reliably like traditional currencies, price volatility remains a roadblock to mainstream use as a medium of exchange rather than just a speculative asset.

Bitcoin Cash's correlation to volatile bitcoin cycles makes spending appetite susceptible to market swings rather than usability, obstructing long-term organic adoption flows.

Competing Payment Rail Networks

Mature payment processors like Visa, PayPal, and local solutions already handle a vast percentage of global commerce. Gaining widespread traction requires cryptocurrencies to deliver substantially better user experiences versus centralized but smooth fiat-based platforms consumers trust. First-mover benefits have been lost here.

Technical Leadership Waning

Major technical improvements are needed for Bitcoin Cash or any cryptocurrency aiming for global usage to scale to visa-level transaction volumes without compromising decentralization or security.

Technical debt from the 2017 technology climate and a more conservative roadmap risk leadership slipping versus emerging layer-1 chains aggressively innovating.

Take a look at this article: Real-World Use Cases of Bitcoin

Limited Apps and Services

For any blockchain to succeed long-term, a robust and thriving ecosystem of applications and services needs to be built on top of it.

While Bitcoin Cash aims to enable this, the app selection and network effects are far smaller than those of Ethereum or other blockchains accepted more widely by developers. Wider use cases need to emerge.

Brand Confusion Hinders Uptake

A major challenge facing Bitcoin Cash is that the general public still needs clarification or perceives it as the same as Bitcoin. This brand confusion stems from Bitcoin Cash's original launch as a fork of the Bitcoin blockchain in 2017 to increase its block size limit.

While Bitcoin Cash advocates emphasize its technical differences aimed at more usability through greater transaction capacity and lower fees, most consumers are familiar with "Bitcoin" as a household name. Surveys still find a low overall understanding of cryptocurrencies among the mainstream.

This presents an ongoing marketing challenge for Bitcoin Cash, which must establish a distinct identity and brand from Bitcoin. Simply existing as a "Bitcoin fork" risks always remaining in the shadow of the original regarding unaided awareness levels.

Even among crypto-savvy audiences, debates still occur about perceived similarities or differences between Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies, with no complete consensus view.

True brand distinction will be necessary for spurring organic adoption beyond speculative trading markets.

Partnerships with merchants and service providers to market Bitcoin Cash uniquely are essential for cultivating wider recognition as more than just an offshoot.

Dependence on Overt Mining Support

When Bitcoin Cash launched, it received a significant boost from overt backing and promotion by some major Bitcoin mining pools and companies. Hardware manufacturers also initially offered support, which helped establish initial network effects.

However, this early dependence on mining supporters introduces central points of failure risk over the long run. If significant backers were to change their mining allegiances or prioritize other projects, it could unsettle the Bitcoin Cash network.

Miners play a role in supporting blockchain security through proof-of-work validation. However, over-reliance on just a handful of mining pools concentrating hash power could undermine the decentralized principles of open participation that cryptocurrencies are built upon.

This also makes the project vulnerable if geopolitical or regulatory pressures threaten certain mining jurisdictions, which contribute disproportionate hashing power.

Additionally, miner support is often tied to short-term business interests assessing profitability rather than long-term platform health.

If blockchain fundamentals falter in delivering on scaling promises, miner incentives could potentially diverge from the protocol's strategic direction and success.

You might also like to read: Binance Coin and Regulatory Compliance

In Essence

While Bitcoin Cash aims to increase Bitcoin's usability through larger blocks and lower fees, competition is fierce from established payment networks and innovative blockchains.

Regulatory risks also cloud the ecosystem. For Bitcoin Cash to thrive long-term, it will require strong technical leadership, building a robust app ecosystem, gaining true brand recognition separate from its origin, and smoothing out volatility obstacles hindering mainstream adoption.

Learn and trade with markets.com: The ultimate trading community!

“When considering “CFDs” for trading and price predictions, remember that trading CFDs involves a significant risk and could result in capital loss. Past performance is not indicative of any future results. This information is provided for informative purposes only and should not be considered investment advice.”