Balancer DeFi Hack: An In-Depth Analysis of Recurring Losses
Amidst a volatile cryptocurrency market, the veteran DeFi protocol Balancer has suffered a significant blow. On November 3rd, on-chain data revealed a suspected hack, leading to the transfer of approximately $70.9 million in assets to new wallets, including 6,850 osETH, 6,590 WETH, and 4,260 wstETH. Lookonchain later reported that total losses had exceeded $116.6 million.
The Balancer team acknowledged the incident, stating they were investigating the potential vulnerability with high priority. They offered a 20% "white hat" bounty for the return of the stolen assets within 48 hours. For seasoned DeFi users, a "Balancer hack" is not a novel occurrence. In fact, the protocol has experienced six security incidents in five years, with a hack occurring almost annually.
A History of Attacks
*   **June 2020: Deflationary Token Vulnerability:** Approximately $520,000 in losses.
*   **March 2023: Euler Incident:** Approximately $11.9 million in losses.
*   **August 2023: Balancer V2 Precision Vulnerability:** Approximately $2.1 million in losses.
*   **September 2023: DNS Hijacking Attack:** Approximately $240,000 in losses.
*   **June 2024: Velocore Hack:** Approximately $6.8 million in losses.
*   **November 2025: Latest Attack:** Losses exceeding $100 million.
Technical Analysis of the Latest Attack
Preliminary analysis suggests a vulnerability in the `manageUserBalance` function within Balancer V2, specifically in the access control checks. The system appears to have failed to properly verify that the caller was the actual owner of the account when checking withdrawal permissions. This allowed attackers to impersonate any account and withdraw internal balances.
Lessons Learned
This "history of hacks" reveals inherent weaknesses in DeFi protocols. The complexity of Balancer's design, allowing for eight tokens with custom weights in a single pool, significantly increases the attack surface. Additionally, Balancer's reliance on rapid iteration and the accumulation of "technical debt" may have contributed to these issues.
Implications for the DeFi Industry
Balancer is just one example of the inherent risks in DeFi. The complexity and composability of these protocols can lead to unforeseen "black swan events." While DeFi represents a novel social experiment, participation comes at a cost. The industry must prioritize security and robustness to ensure sustainable growth.
Risk Warning: this article represents only the author’s views and is for reference only. It does not constitute investment advice or financial guidance, nor does it represent the stance of the Markets.com platform.When considering shares, indices, forex (foreign exchange) and commodities for trading and price predictions, remember that trading CFDs involves a significant degree of risk and could result in capital loss.Past performance is not indicative of any future results. This information is provided for informative purposes only and should not be construed to be investment advice. Trading cryptocurrency CFDs and spread bets is restricted for all UK retail clients.